<em>Spotlight on Lessons Learned:</em> High Pressure Industrial Water Valve Actuator Assembly Failure

The failure of a high pressure industrial water valve actuator assembly at a NASA test stand underscored the need for disciplined configuration control practices to ensure facility systems are built and maintained to the specified design.

In March 2013 technicians were working on modifications to the gaseous nitrogen actuation system supplying the actuator on High Pressure Industrial Water (HPIW) Bypass Valve M-344-IW at the A-1 Test Stand at Stennis Space Center when a failure of the actuator assembly occurred. The failure resulted in ejection of multiple hardware components and impact to surrounding structure and piping, but no personal injury.

The heritage HPIW valve configuration is Flexflo valves, which are plumbed to the Fail-Open position that requires actuation pressure to maintain the valve in the closed position. Due to difficulty in repair or replacement of the Flexflo valve, a Fail-Closed butterfly valve configuration was explored. Multiple engineers were involved with the valve actuator assembly and system configuration changes from 2007 to 2013. When the A-1 Test Stand HPIW water system was brought back online in 2013 and it was discovered the butterfly valve was not cycling properly, initial troubleshooting efforts were hampered by the unique configuration and a lack of full understanding of the original engineer’s intent in the design.

It was later learned that the installation of the butterfly valve was intended to be a temporary change. The system drawings had not been updated to reflect the new valve/actuator type, the addition of a pressure regulator and pressure gauge, and the change from a Fail-Open to a Fail-Closed actuation configuration.

Lesson Number: 24501
Lesson Date: March 12, 2013
Submitting Organization: Stennis Space Center

 

HIGHLIGHTS

LESSONS LEARNED

  • Relative perceptions of low-pressure systems versus high-pressure systems, utilizing inert commodities, and complacency can lead to design errors and operational mistakes.
  • An increased risk of error occurs if temporary changes in operating complex systems are not clearly understood, documented and systematically controlled.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Disciplined configuration control practices are vital to ensure that facility systems are built and maintained to the specified design.
  • Temporary changes — inherent in operating complex systems — need to be clearly understood and documented.

Consult the lesson learned for complete lists.

 

John Stealey Credit: NASA

John Stealey
Photo Credit: NASA

Stennis Space Center CKO John Stealey on the importance of this lesson learned:

A temporary change should be treated with the same discipline and rigor as a permanent change. It can be very easy for a short-term change to remain installed for a greater length of time than originally anticipated. Whether the change is short-duration or long-duration, the best guidance is to always adhere to the same requirements and good engineering practices.

Read the full lesson learned

 

Spotlight on Lessons Learned is a monthly series of articles that feature a valuable lesson along with perspective from NASA’s knowledge management community on why the lesson is important. The full lessons are publicly available in NASA’s Lessons Learned Information System (LLIS).

If you have a favorite NASA lesson learned that belongs in the spotlight, please contact us and be sure to include the LLIS Lesson Number.

About the Author

Share With Your Colleagues